Safety and Risk
Although I felt pretty safe in the controlled training situation, it was obvious that firefighters could be at significant risk in a real emergency. For me, the training session was only an adventure, but for firefighters, it's a way to lower their risk and increase their effectiveness when on a call. Participating in these exercises increased my respect for the dangerous job firefighters do every day.
What Does All This Have To Do With Fire Taxes?
Two things:
- Fairview firefighters are highly trained professionals (or in some cases highly trained volunteers). Their compensation is the main component of the fire tax levy in predominantly career fire districts such as Fairview. Our fire tax dollars primarily pay the people who save our lives and property.
- Fairview firefighters use a great deal of specialized equipment to fight fires, to rescue victims, and to keep firefighters safe. On any given call, only a small fraction of this equipment is used, but different calls will use different equipment. The effectiveness of the fire department on a given call depends in part on having the right tool for the job at hand, as well as knowing how to use it. These tools cost money. Most of this money comes from the local fire tax levy, although some expensive equipment, such as the “jaws of life”, is paid by other sources, such as federal or state grants.
By chance, I happened to witness a Fairview Fire Department team responding to a house fire last evening. It took only 3 minutes after dispatch for this team to appear at the house with a fire truck, and only a few more minutes to get the fire under control. This rapid response prevented major damage to the residence. The rapid response was possible only because the team was already at the fire house, ready to go. In other words, it was only because of Fairview's 24x7 career (paid) staff that this house incurred minor damage. If it were necessary to wait for volunteers to arrive from other locations, this house would most likely have suffered major damage.
What Do Our Fire Tax Dollars Buy?
Fire tax is a hopelessly dry and geeky topic. It's just a bunch of numbers on a piece of paper, or in cyberspace. My report advocating consolidation shows dramatic differences in fire tax rates among fire districts in Dutchess County, with Fairview having the highest fire tax rate. But what do the dramatically different fire tax rates buy? Do higher fire tax rates tend to provide better protection than lower ones? How much better? What does “better protection” really mean? The training drill and the house fire allowed me to touch and feel what the Fairview fire tax dollars buy: Fairview fire taxes buy the ability to contain some fires in their early stages, limiting the threat to human life and the damage to property.
Based on what I've seen and experienced, it is quite plausible to me that fire districts with low tax rates (typically staffed predominantly by volunteers) may tend to have longer response times to emergencies, and therefore less favorable outcomes. In other words, you get what you pay for. Is the high level of service in Fairview worth the high cost? Undoubtedly, different taxpayers will answer this question differently. This is the beginning of a new aspect of learning about fire districts for me. I would like to see how things work in a predominantly volunteer fire district, in order to compare and contrast.
"In other words, it was only because of Fairview's 24 X 7 (paid) staff that this house incurred minor damage."
ReplyDeleteONLY because?????? Think maybe a few other reasons were left out????
Like the limited staff was not tied up on another call among others?
Hello!
With my permission, the Fairview Firefighters Union has copied this post to their site at www.iaff2623.org
ReplyDeleteI can't believe FFD let you into "a burning building to rescue a victim (fortunately, a dummy), and to fight the fire. A respirator — and very close supervision by Fairview's finest — kept my body and soul together."
ReplyDeleteShame on them!! Fairview's finest...HA!
According to NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 1404, "the authority having jurisdiction should not permit respirators with tight fitting facepieces to be worn by members having facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interferes with with valve function, or any condition that interferes with the facepiece-to-face seal or valve function".
Now although NFPA provides guidelines and not laws, any firefighter with common sense knows that facial hair interferes with the seal of the facepiece. You should NEVER have been in there! Maybe tax dollars should be used for shaving kits for when FFD brings the public to "training".
Response to anonymous: Thanks for your concern about my welfare. And, yes, I do have facial hair.
ReplyDeleteMy hosts were well aware of the possibility of a problem with facial hair. They had initially asked me to shave in preparation. However, we were able to find a respirator (after trying 3 different kinds) that sealed just fine. And I had no problem at all breathing inside the smoke-filled building.
Except for the carbon monoxide you may have inhaled....odorless and colorless. If I were a member of a FD, I would be required to have a clean-shaven face. I just can't believe they took a member of the public with a full beard into a burning building. Seems too much of a risk especially after so many tries to get a fit. Enough said, however, I do commend you for taking the time to find out more about the field. I just wish they did it in a safer manner as far as the beard goes.
ReplyDelete